Misconception 1: TA LS harvests losing positions and replaces them with close substitutes

Interest in tax-aware long-short investing (TA LS) has grown rapidly among investors, managers, advisers, and the media alike. 1 1 Close See More Attention on Tax-Aware Investing Is a Good Thing for the Industry and Investors (AQR Tax Matters, 2026). It is understandable that many draw comparisons to a more familiar and long-established tax-aware approach: direct indexing. Indeed, direct indexing and TA LS can be thought of as distant cousins. Both are typically equity strategies. Both incorporate tax considerations into trading decisions. And both are commonly managed in separately managed accounts (SMAs). But that is largely where the similarities end. The comparison becomes problematic when casual observers 2 2 Close By "casual observers," we refer to those who learn about these strategies from secondary sources but do not study them sufficiently to understand how they actually work. extrapolate from direct indexing's investment approach to form a mental model of how TA LS works. This can give rise to a number of misconceptions about the design and mechanics of TA LS, leading to a materially incomplete understanding of the strategy. We aim to address these misconceptions in a series of posts, of which this is the first.

The faulty extrapolation goes like this: direct indexing sells a losing position to harvest a tax loss and then replaces it with a close substitute – a stock much like the one it just sold – to preserve benchmark exposure without running afoul of tax rules. 3 3 Close On why a genuine strategy must make sense before tax—and the pitfalls of trades built purely around close substitutes—see Separating the Wheat from the Chaff (AQR Tax Matters, 2024). TA LS, the reasoning goes, must do the same, except that it also has short positions to harvest losses on. So, TA LS simply trades losing positions across its long and short books and replaces them with close substitutes. This all seems to make sense, except that this is not how TA LS works. The two approaches trade for different reasons because they have very different investment objectives. A direct-indexing strategy seeks to closely track a passive benchmark and deliver its returns more tax-efficiently. By contrast, a TA LS strategy is an active strategy that seeks to materially outperform a benchmark after fees, transaction costs, and financing costs. As a result, the two approaches trade for fundamentally different reasons: Direct indexing trades to harvest losses and match a benchmark: Its goal is to track a passive index as closely as possible while harvesting losses along the way. When it sells a position, it looks for a close substitute precisely because its objective is to minimize tracking error and keep the portfolio "hugging" the benchmark. TA LS trades to follow the alpha model: Its goal is to pursue pre-tax alpha – to outperform, not to track, a benchmark. When a position is liquidated (potentially at a loss), it is mainly because the alpha model no longer "likes" it. The strategy doesn't seek a lookalike replacement because a close substitute would likely be another low-expected-return position. Instead, it replaces the position with one the model "likes" more: the highest-expected-return position available, subject to constraints, such as industry exposures and position sizes, and penalties, such as transaction costs and shorting fees.

The idea behind the "close substitute" extrapolation sometimes takes a broader form: the long and short active portfolios must be very similar to each other – effectively close substitutes – in order to hedge one another properly. This way, the investor can harvest losses while limiting the risk of underperforming the benchmark. Again, this sounds quite reasonable if one applies the rationale of direct indexing. However, this is not what TA LS strategies do. In TA LS, the long portfolio loads positively on factors that the manager expects to be rewarded with excess returns, while the short portfolio loads negatively on those factors. As a result, the long and short portfolios should have opposite exposures to factors associated with expected returns. For example, if the portfolio manager views quality as a factor rewarded with returns, the long portfolio should hold high-quality stocks, while the short portfolio should hold low-quality stocks. Clearly, portfolios of high-quality and low-quality stocks are not close substitutes. Nonetheless, the manager would still be comfortable holding such different long and short portfolios because those differences reflect the risks for which the manager expects to be rewarded with returns. Seen this way, the ability to realize losses on both long and short positions is not the purpose of the TA LS investment process, but rather a byproduct of it. Saying that the long-short portfolio is constructed to harvest losses more effectively gets the logic exactly backwards.

Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing Journal Article - August 31, 2023

Journal Article - August 31, 2023 Separating the Wheat from the Chaff Tax Matters - October 8, 2024

Tax Matters - October 8, 2024 Our Research into Tax-Aware Long-Short Investing Tax Matters - January 28, 2025

Tax Matters - January 28, 2025 More Attention on Tax-Aware Investing Is a Good Thing for the Industry and Investors Tax Matters - August 6, 2026

Tax Matters - August 6, 2026 This material is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice, nor is it intended to replace the advice of a qualified attorney or tax advisor. The recipient should conduct his or her own analysis and consult with professional advisors prior to making any investment decisions. Like any investment strategy designed to generate pre-tax returns, tax-aware investment strategies are subject to the risk of pre-tax returns meaningfully underperforming expectations. Unavailability of potential tax benefits: The expected tax benefits associated with the tax-aware strategy may be less than expected or may not materialize due to the economic performance of the strategy, an investor's particular circumstances, prospective or retroactive changes in applicable tax law, and/or a successful challenge by the IRS. In the case of an IRS challenge, penalties may apply. This document is not intended to, and does not relate specifically to any investment strategy or product that AQR offers. It is being provided merely to provide a framework to assist in the implementation of an investor’s own analysis and an investor’s own view on the topic discussed herein. This document has been provided to you solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and AQR Capital Management, LLC (“AQR”) to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. This document is not to be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. The information set forth herein has been provided to you as secondary information and should not be the primary source for any investment or allocation decision. Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. This material is not research and should not be treated as research. This paper does not represent valuation judgments with respect to any financial instrument, issuer, security or sector that may be described or referenced herein and does not represent a formal or official view of AQR. The views expressed reflect the current views as of the date hereof and neither the author nor AQR undertakes to advise you of any changes in the views expressed herein. The information contained herein is only as current as of the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. The information in this presentation has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, neither AQR nor the author guarantees the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. Nothing contained herein constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice nor is it to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Historic market trends are not reliable indicators of actual future market behavior or future performance of any particular investment which may differ materially, and should not be relied upon as such. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. The information in this paper may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, forecasts or expectations regarding the strategies described herein, and is only current as of the date indicated. There is no assurance that such even